Showing posts with label reading style. Show all posts
Showing posts with label reading style. Show all posts

Friday, January 12, 2018

A REALITY METER SET ON LOW



As a fan and a writer of science fiction romance, my “reality meter” is set pretty low. In fact, I love all things paranormal, supernatural, weird, out-there, futuristic, not-readily-explainable and mind-expanding in addition to your usual adventure-in-space tales. I tend not to demand that a story fit within the normal boundaries of “real life.” I imagine most of you feel the same, dear readers, or you wouldn’t be reading this blog.

Though I will occasionally pick up a good history or biography, or catch an interesting TV documentary, I read—and watch—primarily for escape. That’s why I so often choose romance novels, which can not only transport me to another place and time, but also assure me of an emotionally satisfying ending. On-screen, too, I look for an experience that offers something very different from my daily life—a trip back into history, a glimpse at the future, an adventure in an exotic setting, or, at the very least, thrills and chills and stuff blowing up while I remain safe in my theater seat.

My mom (gone for many years now) always used to say she had no interest in soap operas because she had enough of that kind of drama in her own life. I react the same way to novels or films about dysfunctional families, young people trying to “find themselves,” romantic comedies, or—the latest trend—quirky old people on some kind of quest. (Apologies if those happen to be your favorite kind of stories or films; exceptional examples can always be found, of course.)

A friend with a much higher “reality meter” setting and I recently disagreed on just such a film: THREE BILLBOARDS OUTSIDE EBBING, MISSOURI. Now, already, this is not a film I normally would go for, with its premise of a woman (Frances McDormand) who seeks to shame the local police into solving her daughter’s rape/murder by calling them out publicly on said billboards. But the movie was filmed locally, and my friend recommended it. Since I like Frances McDormand, I tried it.

The acting was great, but the film was disappointing. In particular, I thought the ending left the audience (me) with no sense of closure. The film seemed to have no point, I protested to my friend. But, she responded, that’s just like real life. You often don’t get answers in real life.


Ah, but a film is not real life. It’s fiction, an artificial construct that may reflect real life to a greater or lesser degree, depending on the writer’s choices. The writer is in charge of that construct. The writer can give us answers, unlike real life. I can blame the writer (and the filmmaker in this case) for not giving me the answers I want.

This is the reason I rant and rave at the random killing of beloved characters on television series. I understand that sometimes actors need to leave and move on with their careers. But sometimes, writers just decide to kill characters off for the apparent hell of it (Game of Thrones, Blue Bloods, Walking Dead, Person of Interest, any number of others), weakening the story and leaving fans in gaping disbelief. 

In fiction, random acts do not occur. (I would also argue that truly random acts don’t occur in real life, either, but that’s just my personal philosophy.) Things happen in fiction because writers cause them to happen. In the fictional worlds I create, people die when I want them to die, for reasons I lay out carefully in the plot. These deaths cannot be avoided because they trigger other events; they push the hero and/or the heroine to action, or they signal a pivot in the plot. 

In the same way, if a story is left without an ending I find satisfying, it’s not because “real life” seldom has a neat ending, though that may be the writer’s argument. The writer chooses to tell the story a particular way, and chooses to end it a particular way. If that’s the case, then, as the reader (or film-goer), I can object to the writer’s choice.

Unlike in real life, where I can only act with the knowledge I have, then lodge a futile protest—or send out feelings of gratitude—to the Great Author in the Sky for whatever surprising turns my own story might take.

Cheers, Donna



Friday, April 10, 2015

SPEED READER OR STORY SIPPER: WHAT'S YOUR READING STYLE?



A friend told me the other day that she was deliberately reading my book, Unchained Memory, slowly, so as not to get to the end too fast. She wanted to savor it, she said, so she was holding herself back. 

I wasn’t sure whether to be complimented or insulted. I have to admit I don’t really think of my work as fine wine, to be sipped and rolled around on the tongue. It’s more like a good beer on a hot day—drink it down in a rush of pleasure and plunk your mug on the table with a grin of satisfaction at the end. 

So when people tell me that they couldn’t put the book down, or they stayed up way past their bedtimes reading it, I feel like I did my job. That’s the way I read—in great gulps and marathon binges. I developed my reading style as a child, when I could take a thick book—Swiss Family Robinson, maybe, or Alice’s Adventures in Wonderland—and get lost for a whole rainy afternoon. I don’t have the time to do that anymore—an hour is usually all I can manage at a time these days—but occasionally I will get caught up late at night and forget to go to bed until the couple in question finds their HEA.

But the reader I was speaking to is not the only one out there who might be described as “story sippers” in reading style. These folks like to take their time with a book, lingering over the passages, thinking about the characters. My childhood friend, Joyce, who provided professional advice for UM in her role as a psychiatric nurse, is one of these kinds of readers. It took a while to get the manuscript back from her!

It should be noted that reading style need have nothing to do with actual reading speed. Story sippers don’t read particularly slow. And I don’t read particularly fast. I wish I did. Then I could read more books and join the ranks of those Super-Readers out there who fuel the romance-buying engine. These readers buy (and read!) multiple books per week; they become loyal to certain authors, series, characters; they are active online in book-related forums; they are voracious; and they are the Holy Grail of book promotion. (Cue Heavenly Choir Music.) (Read more about these Super-Readers here.)

In the meantime, my story-sipping friend wanted to know when my next book would be out so she could time the conclusion of Unchained Memory to coincide with the debut of Trouble in Mind. Since that would be some six months from now, I proposed a different solution. Why not give in to temptation and finish this book that you like so much? Then you can read it over again while you wait for Book Two in the Interstellar Rescue series. After all, people do it with movies. I’ve seen LORD OF THE RINGS countless times. (Of course, I’ve also read Tolkien’s trilogy every other year or so since I was 16.)

My friend nodded her head. “You know, that just might work!”

Maybe it would work for all you other story sippers out there, pondering what to tell your writer friends about their latest work. As for us speed readers? All we ask is five more minutes.Really. It’s just getting to the good part . . .

OVER TO YOU
 
What about you? What’s your reading style? And do you even have time to read anymore?


MELANIEANU, WHERE ARE YOU?

MELANIEANU was the winner of my launch week giveaway of an ebook copy of Unchained Memory plus a signed cover card. I still haven’t heard from you, MELANIEANU! Please contact me at dsfrelick@msn.com with your email and home address so I can send you your goodies.

Cheers, Donna