Surprise! I’m NOT going to talk about STAR
WARS today! I’ll leave that to True Fan Laurie on Monday, when I’m sure she
will be eager to share her impressions of the new film.
Instead I have a few mini-reviews of some
excellent film fare that is other-than-STAR WARS. Perhaps as a side benefit of
SW mania, The Syfy Channel is on fire right now with a galaxy full of hot new
suns being born every few months or so.
I mentioned the three-night mini-series
CHILDHOOD’S END last week. Arthur C. Clarke’s apocalyptic tale fared well under
the direction of Nick Hurran and screenwriter Matthew Graham. At least they did
the story justice, despite a few minor tweaks, and stuck with the main premise
of the book, as I remember it. In other words **SPOILER ALERT** no happy ending
for humanity as we know it.The Big Reveal was great, with the aliens' horns, hoofs and tail in splendid display against a gape-mouthed human audience. Despite a failure to do much with an important
secondary character (a religious woman who struggles with the aliens’ presence)
and a major slowdown in the second episode, I’d count this as a success.
But, oh, boy, the show that followed it? Wow!
THE EXPANSE is gritty near-future SF noir
at its best. Earth is unified and prosperous under UN control. Mars is
colonized and powerful under military rule. Earth and Mars are on the brink of
war. “Belters,” unorganized and scrambling for every credit, mine the asteroid
belt for ice and minerals. They’re caught in the middle. Water and air are
resources worth killing for and conflict is inevitable. Add a rich, rebellious Earth
girl who disappears under strange circumstances, a down-on-his-luck Belter
detective hired to find her, what’s left of a Belter ice crew snatched up by a
Martian cruiser and OOOH, YUMMY! Even if the effects, acting and writing weren’t
so good, I’d be in. But they are! If you missed the show’s premiere, you can
binge-watch the first four episodes on Syfy OnDemand.
My final mini-review is not about science
fiction at all. It’s not about romance either. But it is about the writing process, in a way. And also Chris Hemsworth.
In 1820, the whaling ship Essex out of Nantucket, Rhode Island,
was stove by a whale in the literal middle of the Pacific Ocean and sank,
leaving its captain, first mate and several crewmen stranded in three small
boats. The phrase “stove by a whale” means not much to us in this day and age.
No whale has yet tried to attack any of the little boats that cruise along
observing them off the Pacific coast or in Hawaii. But this whale, said to be
from 85 to 100 feet long, made a run at a wooden ship of roughly the same
length and knocked a hole in the hull, then came around, got up to speed and
did it again, smashing the timbers to pieces. The ship’s crew had just enough
time to salvage a few essentials—sails, water casks, hard tack—before the Essex went under.
At the time of the attack, the whalers of the
Essex were hunting in a pod of whales—females
and their calves, males circling the outside. Was this the alpha male
protecting the pod? (Not that whales are known to have alphas.) Or, as these God-fearing
men thought, was it the wrath of God himself, vengeance for some wrong they had
done?
IN THE HEART OF THE SEA, in theaters now, directed
by Ron Howard and starring Chris Hemsworth as a heroic—and thoughtful—first mate
Owen Chase, tells the story of the Essex,
with a little dramatic embellishment. But not as much as the original dramatic
license taken by one Herman Melville, who adapted the tale in 1851 for his
novel Moby Dick, or the White Whale.
What makes Melville’s adaptation an epic literary masterpiece, rather than a
fascinating story of survival against nature, is how he translated the
experience of these particular men into something universal about humanity.
I’ve read part of the book that IN THE HEART
OF THE SEA is based on (I’d like to finish it, too!) and it’s intriguing as
history. But Melville’s novel is transcendent. The beginning—“Call me Ishmael.”
The ending—“Only I am left to tell the tale.” The characters—Ahab (who will
forever look like Gregory Peck to me), Starbuck, Queequeg, Pip. The description
of the whale—white as the snow, with a notch in his tail and a wrinkle over his
brow, crisscrossed with scars and the remnants of harpoons where he’d been
struck before by lost whalers, and he corkscrewed as he breached. (All of this
is noted in the new film, too, by the way—a nice touch.) And the theme, drummed
into generations of high schoolers—man vs. God and the results of that
defiance.
Ron Howard’s device in his film is to have
Melville pull the story of the Essex
out of the youngest survivor of the disaster, now grown old in Nantucket. He’s
heard the story and become obsessed with writing it. But by the end of the old
man’s tale, Melville has seen the elements that will make his novel what
Nathaniel Hawthorne later called “the American epic.” The irony is that the
book sold poorly in Melville’s lifetime, a critical success, but a commercial
failure. The white whale sank him, too.
So, enjoy your weekend at the movies, STAR
WARS fans! If you can’t get into the show, you can always go next door and see
IN THE HEART OF THE SEA or stay home and binge-watch THE EXPANSE.
The next two Fridays bring us Christmas and
New Year’s Day, so I won’t be posting again until January 8, 2016. Enjoy the
holidays, everyone!
Cheers, Donna
I'm totally onboard with your thoughts on The Expanse, Donna. The effects are great, much better than Dark Matter or Killjoys, both of which I loved, and the world building is gritty and mesmerizing. I've only seen the first two episodes and I'm totally on the hook. SyFy has given Sci-Fi new hope of late. Three cheers for that!
ReplyDeleteAnd The Heart of the Sea looks like an amazing tale. I hope to go see it soon. This week was, of course, totally dominated by the "Awakening" of Star Wars. More on that to come. :)