Dear Readers:

We appreciate the fact the current political environment is highly charged, but we want to keep Spacefreighters Lounge a stress-free place for everyone to visit and exchange ideas about SFR.

Therefore, we ask that you please refrain from making political references that may antagonize those with differing viewpoints. Thank you for your consideration.

Friday, June 1, 2012

THERE'S BLOOD IN THEM THAR HILLS

The History Channel just dragged viewers through one of uglier chapters of our nation’s past with a three-part miniseries on the legendary feud between the Hatfields (left, in 1897) and the McCoys.

This was a major television production with lots of big names (Kevin Costner, Bill Paxton, Tom Berenger, Mare Winningham, Powers Boothe), dozens of extras, authentic costuming and period weaponry. The producers even went to the expense of filming on location in the Carpathian Mountains of Romania—and who knew they looked so much like the West Virginia/Kentucky border of the 1880’s? (I guess the filmmakers were unaware some parts of the West Virginia/Kentucky border haven’t changed much since the 1880’s, at least in terms of the topography.)

The result was an authentically graphic reproduction of the sad bloodbath that was the Hatfield-McCoy feud, a war between two families that lasted for decades, killed dozens and employed the legal machinery of two states in their dispute all the way up to the Supreme Court. (Not until J.Edgar Hoover’s FBI required extraordinary power to cross state lines in pursuit of criminals was the Supreme Court decision in the Hatfield-McCoy case overturned. The case revolved around a Kentucky warrant to pursue Hatfields into West Virginia to return them to Kentucky for prosecution of the murder of several McCoys. Those McCoys, it should be pointed out, had killed patriarch “Devil Anse” Hatfield’s brother.)

The acting in the miniseries was excellent. The historical details were worthy of The History Channel’s name. The six hours were as grim and unrelenting as the subject matter required. And yet viewers were offered this story without any historical or cultural context and every dirty, barefoot, moonshine swillin’, overall-wearin’ stereotype of Appalachian culture ever invented was given full rein. Yes, this feud was stupid, because people are stupid. But some viewers are going to come away with the idea that this could only have happened because these people were stupid hillbillies.

An example: In the Appalachia of the 1880’s there were few roads (and those of dubious quality) cutting through the steep mountains to connect small, isolated communities and homesteads. The only crop that would grow in the mountains, corn, could not be transported to markets over these roads, so it was distilled into whiskey, a higher value, lower volume “crop”.

So, yes, corn whiskey (white lightning, moonshine) was a foundation of the economy and stills were common. People built them away from their cabins because the boilers were prone to explode, thus they needed tending. Does that mean men laid up at the stills drinking all day and night as was implied in the miniseries? Well, probably a few of them did. But everybody? And couldn’t some mention have been made of what this was all about? Since a lot of the mayhem revolved around the stills (and the whiskey), seems like it might have been worth a line of dialogue or two.

Much was made of the incident that began the feud, a split between the two patriarchs, Randall McCoy and Anse Hatfield, toward the end of the Civil War. Hatfield, having fought bravely for the Confederacy throughout the war, had had enough. He quit the field on the eve of yet another battle and went home. McCoy saw this as not only cowardice and desertion, but as a personal betrayal (they had been friends),and made Hatfield the target of his bitterness once he was captured and made a prisoner of war for the rest of the conflict.

The truth is, though, many mountain folk, um, left the war early, seeing that this was not a conflict in their interest. My own West Virginia relatives on the Presley side are officially listed as deserters from the Confederacy (a fact I’m proud to own) early in the war. Clearly they figured they owned no slaves, no one was attacking their hollows, no one was paying them the bounties they were promised, so why were they fighting? Like Anse Hatfield, they went home to tend their fields and, I guess, their stills.

Randall McCoy was portrayed in the miniseries as a rigid, uncompromising man, qualities of character only made worse by his imprisonment and a religious bent. Each slight by Anse Hatfield or a member of his family, every piece of good luck for the Hatfields or ill fortune for the McCoys, only added fuel to the slow burn of his anger until it burned out of control.

Human failures, certainly, but in the Scots-Irish culture of the Appalachians, very common. Folks tend not to talk a lot about their problems in the mountains. The reaction to any emotional stimulus just seems to come from out of nowhere. Anyone standing in the vicinity just never knows what hit him. So a feud is no surprise. A fistfight becomes a stabbing. A stabbing leads to a firing squad. McCoy refuses an olive branch. Hatfield’s uncle presides over the burning of McCoy’s cabin. And on and on.

I would have liked to have seen some more of this kind of context and less of the blood-and-guts byplay of the bounty hunters McCoy brought in to hunt the Hatfields. But then, my family is from that area of West Virginia, and I can even claim some distant relationship to the Hatfields. I get enough of the West Virginia jokes as it is. I imagine those will increase as a result of The Hatfields and the McCoys.

In a way, this story was inspiring, though. It’s not hard to imagine the setting on a planet far, far away, two clans in some inaccessible mountain hollers, plagued by their own fears, greed and violence and set upon by . . . something even more sinister!

Cheers, Donna

6 comments:

  1. Eye of the beholder, I guess. I didn't assume any of the cornpone assumptions about the people. I saw Anse as a successful entrepreneur. And like those of THAT breed, he tended toward ruthless in business dealings. I loved the part where he brought the tombstone into town to show that Cline was trying to defraud him. On the other hand, Anse most likely took advantage of some loose legal wording to get the timber rights in dispute.

    I saw Randle McCoy as an honorable, overly religious man who was destroyed by war. A victim of PTSD even then. His rigidity kept him from being as successful as Anse, and that ate at him to the point of mania. His treatment of his daughter, Roseanna, was horrible.

    And poor Cotton Top, the only innocent amongst the combatants, paid the price to quell the feud.

    These were all complex, intelligent people products of their time and environment. I admired them while being disgusted with their continuing unnecessary violence coming from pride and inflexibility.

    Overall, I thought it was an excellent series. I wish my father was still alive. This was just the type of entertainment he loved. Not Old West, but very much like the west of the late 19th Century.

    Thanks for reviewing the series. I do love the History channel. Even its silly stuff like UFOs and Bigfoot.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Not made it to the UK yet, but Kevin Costner in it - oh yes, I'm shallow, I'll watch it!

    ReplyDelete
  3. Great review, Donna, and interesting comments, Marva. (And Barbara, I'm with you on watching anything Kevin Costner).

    I was able to watch a little of the series but not enough to get the gist of what spurred the conflict or the characters involved. Would love to watch it from the beginning.

    I'm another huge fan of the History Channel, and much prefer even the fringe UFO and Finding Bigfoot series to pointless network reality shows and mindless sitcoms.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Like Barbara, I'm in the UK, so it could be years before that reaches here.

    ReplyDelete
  5. Being from the "dark" parts of the Eastern Kentucky hills,I could totally relate to many of the deals in this series. These 'ol mountain people were serious and remain so today. I mean, if they tell you to take notice of their land or belongs[and respect these],you had better take them serious. They do not use idle banter like our northern relatives do. Everything is still rock solid,serious. Excellent portayals opf early appalachian history.

    ReplyDelete
  6. That much I'll agree with you about, John! A person's word is definitely his or her bond in the hills. Thanks for stopping by!

    ReplyDelete

Comments set on moderation - all spammers will be exterminated!