Friday, June 7, 2013

OF SQUARE PEGS AND ROUND HOLES



Ye, gods, where to start?  

By now most of the science fiction world and half of the romance community have weighed in on the controversy generated by comments made by SF writers Mike Resnick and Barry Malzberg in a recent issue of the SFWA Bulletin. (See Pippa Jay’s excellent post earlier this week and the list of relevant links.)  This coming on top of Stuart Sharp’s blundering attempt to note the rise of SFR in a post on The Story Hub that sounded more like a scream of “run for the hills!”

In case you’ve been hiding under a rock for a couple of weeks (or blissfully enjoying a vacation on Wrigley’s Pleasure Planet), the gist of the argument from both of these camps in the swamps of the Mesozoic is: girls are purdy but they don’t know crap about writing science fiction.  They’re messing up our real science fiction with their kissy-face fake science fiction stuff.   Oh, and some lady writers are particularly purdy.  And if you don’t like what I say, you are a liberal fascist (sic).

Some days I don’t know whether to laugh or cry.  Or grab a phaser and just start blasting. 

Pippa, in her post, asks, with some justification, is it not 2013?  Yes, but as a lifelong feminist and a lifetime member of the NAACP, let me tell you, 2013 is not the 23rd Century envisioned by Gene Roddenberry, where equality rules in the crew of the Enterprise.  And I long ago realized that the science fiction “community” is one of the last bastions of male tradition, along with the military, the police and the hard sciences.  Just because there were women who wrote it, women who read it, even individual women who were successful at it, did not mean that women as a group were accepted into the fold.  And the kind of science fiction that women more generally like to write—with character at the center of the story—lost a hold in science fiction when the market for SF shrank back in the late 1970’s.

So why be surprised that now when science fiction romance is beginning to find some success outside of the traditional SF community—through digital or small presses or even with romance-oriented houses—the old-school guys in SF are squawking?  It’s the same reaction I get when I tell my guy friends who read SF that I write SFR.  The kindest thing they say is, “You lost me at romance.”

Really?  Okay.  Because there are these millions of other readers out there who just might be interested in the romance.  SFR’s dogged pursuit of the miniscule SF market is just a little too reminiscent of a child begging for the attention of an emotionally-unavailable father.  I say we grow up now and seek out a lover who can give us the affection we need. 

In the forty years since SF’s last heyday in the Seventies, romance has gone from a narrow focus on stories involving millionaire bosses, pirates and cowboys, to embrace werewolves, vampires, angels, dukes, hometown boys, Navy SEALS, PI’s, and, yes, even some starship captains and sexy aliens.  It has become a huge industry with the largest readership of any single genre.  According to figures on the RWA website, romance fiction held the largest share of the U.S. consumer market in 2012, with 16.7 percent, generating $1.4 billion in sales. 

By comparison, in 2012, SF/F sales amounted to $590.2 million.  More importantly, its core readers, writers, editors and marketers seem largely to be stuck in a time warp.  And I don’t mean one in which they’re in the future.

That wouldn’t matter so much if writers of SFR weren’t stuck with the dilemma of finding the right market for their books—seeking out agents, selling to the right publishing house, determining covers and marketing strategies, coming up with taglines and pitches and all the rest.  Given the choices outlined above, you would think it would be easy to go where the readers are, but the story should drive the decision and that complicates things.  What if the romance in the book amounts to mere elements?  Then surely that leaves you in the SF camp?  (With the dinosaurs.  Sorry.)  What if the SF is really tech-y, but the romance arc is clear and, well, hot?  Might be a hard sell on the romance side, but no sell at all with the dinos.  **sigh**

My agent asked me a few weeks ago if we should try a few of the SF publishing houses in light of a spate of rejections from the traditional romance houses.  I thought about it, but in the end we agreed to leave the SF houses off the list.  I told her I didn’t think they’d know what to do with me.  Given the controversy that has erupted since then, my instincts were right.  My stories are science fiction romances and, given a chance, I know romance readers will embrace them.  That’s a much larger and more welcoming audience than I would ever have in science fiction.

That decision felt right to me.  Sort of like the day I decided to take the straight SF story I was struggling with and rework it as a science fiction romance.  Unchained Memory works much better as SFR.  And it always feels better to stop trying to fit a square peg into a round hole.

Cheers, Donna


Wednesday, June 5, 2013

I'm a Girl. I write SF and SFR. And I'm not going away...

*taps phone* That date is right, yes? 2013? This *is* the 21st century?

Because this last week, I've begun to doubt it. We're supposed to be a civilized and evolved society, at least as far as the West is concerned. We're supposed to be intelligent, logical and reasonable human beings? With laws about equality and human rights and rules against hate speech and the like. Right?

So a couple of guys published a column about 'lady writers' and 'lady editors' and how they'd look in a swimsuit, in an edition of the SFWA Bulletin that unfortunately featured a woman in a chainmail bikini. Silly boys! They're weren't serious, surely? And even if they are, they're the minority and they'll get laughed at and told to take their misogynist, out-dated views elsewhere. Won't they?

Except they didn't. Not loudly enough or quickly enough. But the protests they got were quickly decried as censorship. What, us 'lady writers' saying we found it offensive is bullying YOU? Huh?

And so it rolled on. President John Scalzi offered an apology. They promised a review. Promised this wasn't the view of the majority (and I really hope it isn't). But it didn't end there. A guy proffered the view that writers of SFR and female writers of SF are somehow destroying the genre. Polluting its purity. Writing 'bad' scifi. What. The. Hell?

On one hand he condemns us for breaking the 'rules' of SF, yet also for bringing new dimensions to it. Um, contradictory much? Which is it?

I always thought writing SF was about diversity. Breaking the mold and the 'rules'. Exploring boundaries and pushing past them. I thought that applied to the mentality of the authors too. Open. Diverse. Enlightened. And yet by doing that, we're wrong because we aren't conforming to 'true' SF, but somehow at the same time we aren't doing anything innovative? Man, you've invalidated your own argument right there. Sorry dude.

So you don't like female authored SF and you hate SFR? There's a very simple and obvious solution. DON'T READ IT! Damn it, did that really need saying?! We have readers, and fortunately it's not within your power to tell them what they can and can't read. Even if the entire publishing industry rejected us (and hey, that's not happening so I guess a lot of the powers-that-be in the publishing industry are a helluva sight more open minded and progressive) there's still self publishing. We have an audience. People LIKE our stuff. And guess what? We're going to keep on writing it.

One person suggested that maybe they feel threatened by SFR. Maybe they're worried about their sales. But it's their attitude that will damage their sales, not us. Think about it. I don't know any women who read hard scifi aside from my fellow female SF/SFR authors - the ones getting slammed here. So the guys making these statements are alienating a part of their readership - the authors they denigrate, and those who generally dislike such Neanderthal attitudes. Maybe only a small section, but in these precarious economic times, is that wise? Also, the number of readers I've had who say 'I don't normally read scifi, but after reading yours I may try it...' Dudes, we are bringing a new audience to the genre! But your comments will surely drive them away. Or at least drive them away from YOUR work.

The advent of eBooks has increased the number of book sales in general, so it's not a case of leaving one genre to read another. ALL genres are selling more, so it's not really a competition. Before digital I'd buy maybe a book or two, and no more until I'd read them (or could afford it). Now I have 80 titles on my Kindle waiting to be read. I'm buying way more books overall, and I'm not the only one. I'm still buying the hard scifi coming from my fave authors, but I'm also buying new SFR titles. And fantasy. And YA. Book buying is on the increase, which is good for ALL of us.

So is the issue that, as the Huffington post puts it, the guys don't want to share their sandbox? Tough. Most us as have been here just as long as the boys. They just didn't notice, or chose to ignore us. Until now.

But I think the worse thing is the comments and hate mail some authors are getting over this. Check out Ann Aguirre's post to see what they have to deal with. Obscene! Bad enough the instructions to stop whining. No, it get far worse. Suggestions that a good <word so offensive I can't even type it> would fix her. Oh, of course! Having sex with a woman (and the inference is it wouldn't be consensual sex on her part either) will fix it. That'll shut her up. Rape fixes everything.That's all any woman who dares to write SF and dares to defend her right to do so really needs to keep her quiet!

Colour me horrified. Is this really 21st century enlightenment?! That's your reasoned argument to a woman protesting her right to be a science fiction author?! Is that the only response you have?

It tells me one thing for sure. No one - NOT ONE PERSON - can logically and reasonably and with good cause tell us why we can't and shouldn't write SF, and why we should be able to do so without being made to feel we are wrong or invalid or second class authors for doing so. Some of them cannot think of any way to silence us except with the most horrific and mindless threats. I can't and don't understand what goes on in their heads. Why they feel driven to behave like this. It's more alien to me than any of the worlds I create.

You don't like what we write? Don't read it. I don't expect everyone to love my books, but why go out of your way to read something you've already decided to hate? We have readers. And thanks to public hissy fits over the 'horror' of female SF/SFR authors, more potential readers are hearing about it and are learning about your attitude. Here's a comment on Ann's blog showing that not all men think girls shouldn't be writing scifi, and exactly what effect those naysayers are creating.

"I’m a straight white male lifelong SF reader. Grimspace sounded a bit interesting to me until I read the misogynist troll emails, then I decided that anything that’s so hated by spiteful idiots must be awesome, and immediately ordered a copy. Great marketing work, misogynist trolls!"

So. I'm a girl, and I write SF & SFR. And I'm not going away...

If you're still bewildered as to what the heck this is all about, check out the blog posts below. In particular read the hate mail and comments directed at Ann Aguirre simply because she refused to stay silent. In the meantime I'd like to echo co-blogger Sharon's post about gratitude toward the romance readers. You don't hear them crying foul at the various sub-genres of romance, or over male authors in the genre. Romance readers love a good, heartfelt story, and I am incredibly grateful to all of those who gave my work a chance. Thank you.



Pippa's Journal 

Mission Success
On Monday my second novel released - Gethyon, a YA scifi novel WRITTEN BY A GIRL! *coughs* Yay me! Gethyon had already hit number one on the Omnilit bestsellers list while still on pre-order - I won't know any sales figures until September when my first royalties come in. Ugh! But it means I actually have a backlist! Well, okay, not a very big or old or long one, but FOUR TITLES to my name! Considering my first novel only came out a year ago (okay, I self published a short story about a year before THAT, but I don't officially count that one because it was an experiment more than anything) I feel that's good progress for a newbie. Of course, I'm hungry for more...but patience, my young apprentice...

 
Anyway, the virtual tour has already kicked off but you can find all the venues and giveaway details here. 

I really believed that this time around I would really have a handle on the whole book launch and promotion thing. And I *did* learn a huge amount from Keir's release. One major thing was having actual sales links to send out to my tour hosts, something I didn't do with Keir. I also planned a longer tour and aimed for more diverse hosts, perhaps opting for blogs that I might not have thought to guest on before, let alone ask. Gethyon has been more difficult in some respect because my first novel was a scifi romance, and this is a YA scifi with no romance at all. So, I've pushed myself well out of what has now become my comfort zone, making much of the experience a new thing all over again! But I've also been touched by the generosity and support of friends old and new for the launch, and also readers. One contacted me out of the blue and offered to spotlight Gethyon on her blog, even though it focuses mainly on romance, because she'd read and loved Keir. It's kind of weird to be popular! :D

And now we have less than three weeks until the SFR Brigade's 2nd Midsummer blog hop. Eeep! I can tell you there's going to be some awesome prizes (yes, plural!) thanks to the generosity of those who've donated so far - one person in particular. I'll be posting details on the main SFR Brigade blog later in the week. So if you haven't signed up yet, join us! It's going to be a fantastic event.


Ping Pong

@Laurie - great interview! And as an inhabitant of the British Isles I know the Inside Out program very well (my brother in law took part in an episode featuring the Roman history of my home town Colchester). They love to do unusual stories and often an odd mixture of topics. How cool to see someone I know starring in one!

@Sharon - hugest congrats, and I loved your thank you letter to the romance readers. Let's hope all this negativity gives a more positive outcome.

@Donna - great post on titles. They're so important to a piece of work - mine doesn't have a formal identity until it at least has a working title that I'm comfortable with. 

Monday, June 3, 2013

SFR/Romance Author Barbara Elsborg Interviewed by BBC Television


One of our favorite authors, Barbara Elsborg, posted on Facebook recently that she'd been interviewed by BBC, a British television network. Sounds like a dream come true for a multi-published author, doesn't it? (Or if you're like a lot of introverted writers, maybe you'd consider it more of a nightmare?)

I wasted no time in shooting her an email to ask if she'd tell us about what it's like to do a television interview, and she graciously agreed. Barbara's here today to answer a few questions about her experience.

So, Barbara, please tell us how this all came about? How did BBC contact you and what ensued? Was there a particular book or topic that was the focus? 

One of my husband's relatives recently changed jobs from BBC radio to BBC TV. Sarah was actually my little bridesmaid many moons ago. She called me up to ask a question about taking a vacation in the States and asked me how my writing was going. I told her. It was just at the time that sales of Strangers had gone through the roof after the success of Fifty Shades of Grey. Up 3,000%!!

Sarah had been contemplating a program about DH Lawrence, who wrote Lady Chatterley's Lover, Sons and Lovers, The Rainbow, etc. He wrote not just about love, but social prejudice and the plight of the mining villages in the East Midlands. I come from the area where he was born and brought up. Lawrence went to Ilkeston Grammar School - as did I - and he was a pupil-teacher at the primary school I went to. Obviously decades apart!

Sarah had the idea of linking Lawrence's literary erotic romance and the obscenity trial, to me and modern erotic romance as a way to show how times have changed and tastes have changed. The program includes a local reading group discussing Strangers and Lady Chatterley's Lover, and also features Dr. John Worthen, Lawrence's biographer.

What great connections to D.H. Lawrence you have! What were your thoughts on being asked to do the interview by BBC? Excitement? Bliss? Sheer terror? 

At London Book Fair
At first, I didn't think too much about it. I think I'd assumed I'd just be mentioned and then when Sarah starting to talk about filming, I thought - oh flipping heck! She wanted to film in London at the book fair, then in Eastwood in the wood where Lawrence pictured Lady Chatterley and Mellors, the gamekeeper, and also to film me at home, writing. I was petrified in London, less scared in Eastwood and okay by the time I was filmed at home.

I'm not sure my nerves would have settled down even then.

So, what happened next? I'm curious how much planning and preparation went into the interview? Were you able to make suggestions or talk about ideas for the interview? How much time passed between you agreeing to do the interview and the actual filming? 

Sarah first mentioned it just after Christmas - we exchanged a few emails when she asked for background info on me and my books. The book fair filming was done in April, the part at home was done last week and the program will air in the autumn. A lot of editing to be done!

The actual interviews - London and home - I didn't know what I was going to be asked. I was miked up and given a few hints - e.g. chat to Raelene Gorlinsky from Ellora's Cave - about how you feel about being at the Book Fair. My mind went instantly blank. We'd already talked for an hour. I couldn't think of a thing to say! But eventually I blabbed something. The interviewer - who is the head of the program and Sarah's boss, asked me questions off camera and then moments later, asked me on camera. You don't have long to think. I suspect they want natural flowing speech.

I had to do a couple of things twice when I dried up. Raelene was a real pro. I suspect she'd done it lots of times before. They filmed me walking about, not looking at the camera - that was fun. I wondered if people thought - who's she!

What did you do to prepare? Did you study? Rehearse? Buy a disguise? 

I thought about a few things - such as - do I think I owe a debt to Lawrence, what did I think of his sex scenes, what would he have thought of my books, why do women like erotic romance, etc. but I was largely guided by the questions they asked - and no, I didn't know more than a few minutes ahead what they would be. No rehearsal - just filmed straight away!

As for a disguise, well when I went to the Book Fair, I went via daughter's who took one look at my outfit and made me change. I wore her jacket, her top, her necklace!

So tell us what all happened the day for the interview? How did the day go? Where was it filmed? What did you talk about? Were you nervous? What surprised you and what do you think went particularly well? 

The main part for me was here in my house. We had to reorganise the room I write in to give the cameraman the right angle. I should say that both cameramen were lovely. So kind and just really nice guys. Lots praise and no hint that they were bothered about dealing with someone who had no idea what they were doing. They arrived at 10.30. Filmed me typing, filmed me reading and then interviewed me. All over by 1.30.

It all takes a lot longer than you'd think. Not helped by changing light levels as it rained off and on. I was nervous but not as much as I had been in London. I refused to think about what I'd said once it was done otherwise I suspect I'd have freaked out. What's done is done. I can't change it so I hope it edits okay. The program is not just about me. They interviewed Raelene, Dr. Worthen and also went to Lincoln to interview Total-E-Bound.

I think what surprised me most was how hard it was to just speak on camera with no script. It gave me renewed admiration for those who do it for a living. I've never been good at thinking on my feet.

What went well? I hope I made sense when I spoke. I think I was a bit gushy in London but had calmed down by the time I was interviewed here.

Now for the big question. Where and when can we see your interview? Will it be available outside the BBC market? Will you have permission to post links on your blog or website? 

Well, even I don't know the date yet. Only that it will be on in the autumn. The program is called Inside Out. It's a show that covers different subjects every week. It airs at 7.30 so there has to be some care taken over content as it's not beyond the watershed. It will air regionally first and hopefully nationally later.

I did hear something said about a disk so I don't know if I get to look at the show first or not. As for clips - I hope so but I'll have to wait and see.

Any last thoughts on the whole experience? Would you do it again? What advice can you offer to other authors who might be asked to do a television interview? 

Yes, I'd do it again. I'm quite a shy person. I don't tend to post pics of myself but this has made me more forward. No point pretending I'm Angelina Jolie when I'm not! To any other authors who're asked to do a TV interview - absolutely go for it. If you can get copies of questions beforehand, then do because at least it gives you chance to think of an answer.

I don't know what the book club people will say about Strangers. Maybe they hated it, who knows, but it's still publicity. If E. L. James can do it with Fifty Shades of Grey, maybe I can too.

Thanks so much, Barbara, and many congrats on one uber exciting (and scary) opportunity. Now we all know a little more about the question: What if you get asked to do a TV interview!

In addition to the highly acclaimed Strangers, Barbara Elsborg is the author of over 25 other novels including one of our very favorite Science Fiction Romance/Eroticas, Lucy in the Sky. Read more about Barbara's work on her Amazon profile, or visit her web site, Barbara Elsborg Online.

And here's a surprise for our readers. To celebrate Barbara's BBC interview and our Spacefreighters Lounge 125,000th hit, one randomly selected commenter will win a free copy of a choice of Strangers or Lucy in the Sky. (Note: For those outside the US we may have to restrict the prize to an ebook or an Amazon gift card.) 

Sunday, June 2, 2013

Big News on The Ophelia Prophecy!


Spacefreighters Lounge is proud to announce that

Sharon Lynn Fisher's

eagerly anticipated second novel

The Ophelia Prophecy

is now available for pre-order!

Click here for the Amazon link.
Click here for more links and info on Sharon's web site.

The Ophelia Prophecy debuts 
February 18, 2014
from Tor Books

Congratulations, Sharon!