When I was a youngster we learned a bit of basic stuff about
our solar system at school and, because I was a voracious reader, in
encyclopedias. They used to be the hard-cover equivalent of Google back then. 😊
The solar system and how the planets formed was all very
logical. The sun started as a spinning accretion of gas clouds that condensed until
it kind of 'turned on' and started to produce light and energy as a fusion reactor. During this process it spat out concentric rings of
material which in turn started their own cycle of condensation. The first
planets, those closest to the sun, were comprised of the heavier materials.
Thus we had Mercury, Venus, Earth, and Mars. We skipped over the asteroid belt.
I don't remember the explanation back then. Not enough material to coalesce
into a new planet? Disrupted by Jupiter's massive gravity field? Then it was on
to the gas giants – Saturn, mighty Jupiter, Uranus, and Neptune. Then, as an
afterthought of left-overs, Pluto. They all danced around the sun in a pretty
much flat plane and some of them had moons of their own. Back then the moonless
planets were Mercury, Venus, and Pluto.
All this was a simplified view of the solar system, suitable
for kids and people not interested in science and astronomy, which was just about everybody. That superficial veneer of uniformity drops off fairly quickly when
start to look more closely. Venus and Uranus rotate in the opposite direction to all the other
planets (ie the sun rises in the west). Venus's day is longer than its year.
Uranus rotates on its side (ie the axis of the poles points at the sun). Pluto
turned out to be a binary system with its large moon, Charon, and was demoted
to a dwarf planet. Oh – and Pluto does not orbit in the same plane as its
erstwhile siblings. Its orbit is at a 17°
angle from the plane. It's also more circular, so sometimes Pluto is closer to
the sun than Neptune. However, there's no chance of a collision between Pluto
and Neptune because "for every two orbits that Pluto makes around
the Sun, Neptune makes three, which prevents close encounters between them that
would otherwise destabilize their orbits." [1]
We knew there were thick clouds blanketing Venus's
atmosphere – but it wasn't until space craft visited that we learned that Venus
isn't covered with lush jungles as depicted in many SF stories of the '50s and
'60s.
Another popularly supported myth, originating from Italian
astronomer Giovanni Schiaparelli, who observed Mars in 1877, was the network of canals on the planet's surface.
We now know that's not true. Mars might have supported water and life eons ago
but not anymore. But that myth inspired writers like HG Wells and Edgar Rice
Burroughs to write his books.
We knew very little about the outer
planets until the seventies when the Voyager missions visited. Astronomers
found many, many more moons, marvelled at the rings of Saturn and the moonlets
that acted as shepherds of the rings. We found out there are volcanoes on at
least one of Jupiter's moons and that moons might have oceans. We learned that ALL
of the gas giants – Saturn, Jupiter, Uranus, and Neptune – have rings. In the
recent New Horizons visit to Pluto astronomers were astonished to find evidence
of lava flows on the planet, since it's so cold out there.
Now we know Jupiter's famous Red Spot, a massive
cyclonic storm larger than the diameter of the Earth, is shrinking. Over time
Saturn's iconic rings will disappear. And an object (named Kiku) has been spotted
in the solar system beyond Neptune's orbit that orbits in the opposite
direction to all the other satellites of the sun. Scientists,
as they say, are baffled.
There is so much more to learn.
I was delighted to hear Mike Pence say
that the US wants humans to return to the Moon by 2024. [2]
It's regrettable that the reason is very likely much the same as the reasons
for the space race in the 'sixties – rivalry with Russia and I suspect more
importantly today, with China. But it hardly matters. Space exploration has
languished for too long. It has been forty-seven years since a man stood on the
lunar surface and that probably has to happen before we even think about
landing anyone on Mars. I'm glad I have a chance of being around when that
happens again.
I'm glad too, Greta. So great to see the space program finally being jump-started after languishing for so long. The new technology and by-products our space program brings to us are amazing.
ReplyDelete