Showing posts with label Golden Heart Awards. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Golden Heart Awards. Show all posts

Friday, December 2, 2016

THE BEGINNING OF THE END FOR GOLDEN HEART?


Me with some of the 2012 class of Golden Heart Finalists--the Firebirds

 The membership of the Romance Writers of America® was thrown into an uproar last week by the announcement of changes in the schedule for its annual conference in July. Several major revisions in the time-honored sequence of events were made by the elected Board of Directors, including moving the popular Literacy Signing (a charity event featuring dozens of writers, from big-names to debut authors) from Wednesday night to Saturday afternoon, a timing more like the RT Booklovers convention. The new schedule also places the big RITA® awards gala (for published authors) on Thursday night rather than at the end of the conference.
 


But the change that has drawn the most controversy was the decision to split the Golden Heart® awards ceremony (for unpublished authors) off from the RITA® event and schedule it at a luncheon on Thursday. I was not the only past Golden Heart® Finalist who considered this to be a clear demotion of Golden Heart®. Facebook and GH alumni loops were alight with animated discussion of the move, and most past GH honorees refused to buy the official RWA line that the separation of the ceremonies was an attempt to give Golden Heart® Finalists their own special spotlight.

How? By shoehorning the Finalists into a dark corner of the schedule in the middle of the day in the middle of the week, when many conference attendees would be busy with agent or publisher meetings? By depriving the new crop of Finalists of the experience we all had of dressing in our fancy ball gowns and attending the ceremony with The Nora and all the rest—and having them hear our names called out? And, most importantly, by announcing the winners of the Golden Heart® contest before the pitch sessions with agents and publishers that take place on Thursday afternoon and Friday?

As Board members were called upon to defend the decision, it soon became clear that the premier contest for unpublished romance writers in the world had slipped in importance within the organization. Entries were down for Golden Heart® in this era of indie publishing, Board members said, just like entries are down for chapter contests, so . . .

So instead of doing something to encourage entries in the contest—like requiring judges to provide feedback, or rethinking categories (why not split up the huge paranormal category to allow a separate SFR category, for instance)—the Board decided that GH® could no longer justify its position of importance in the organization. Other things, most notably the professional RITA® awards, took precedence, so the Board re-ordered the schedule to give GH® less time and significance.

The problem here is much larger than a seemingly small change in the conference schedule. It has to do with the definition and direction of RWA itself, which the organization has been struggling with for the last few years. What is, and what should be, RWA’s core membership? And how does RWA best serve that core membership? Are we an organization of romance writers? Or only of professional (ie. income-earning) romance writers?

Since its inception, the organization has sponsored continuing education and professional support for established authors (PAN). But it has also encouraged new and aspiring writers with networking, educational programs, mentoring, and paths to publishing (PRO). For years, members could say with pride that RWA was the only professional writers’ organization in the world that admitted unpublished authors, and provided a means for those authors to improve their craft. 

The Golden Heart® contest, as the pinnacle of the regional or chapter contest circuit for unpublished authors, was a major part of this improvement effort. In sending manuscripts out to contests, writers got specific feedback and encouragement they could get in no other way. By finaling in the Golden Heart® contest, they got recognition that they were “the best of the best.” And the publishing establishment saw it, too.

I had unsuccessfully queried nearly every legitimate agent in the U.S. who had not specifically ruled out science fiction or romance with my first book, Unchained Memory, before the manuscript finaled in the Golden Heart® contest in 2012. After I became a Finalist, I re-queried several of the same agents. All of a sudden, those agents wanted to see the full manuscript. And one, the wonderful Michelle Johnson, finally called with an offer. Many of my fellow Firebirds (the cadre of Finalists from that year) had the same experience. Even those who didn’t win the actual award saw a real boost in their careers from finaling.

But, the RWA Board is arguing, indie writers just aren’t interested in competing in contests. Why should they when they can self-publish without the help of an agent or traditional publisher? I would counter that getting the attention of agents and publishers is only one reason to compete. In fact, it’s the last reason. 

By the time Unchained Memory reached Golden Heart®, the manuscript had been through at least ten chapter/regional contests and had been polished according to the feedback I’d received. Sometimes I wish even now I could send my manuscripts through that crucible again. No critique partner will ever be as brutally honest as some of those chapter judges! And no editor will tell you to go back and start over on a project because it’s fundamentally flawed; he or she will only take what you give them and do their best to work with it. Self-published authors are at a distinct disadvantage because they have no one to tell them if they have gone horribly wrong—no agent, no publisher, no filter.

And if you don’t believe that is a problem, just glance through the hundreds of terrible titles your good book is competing with out there.

As a long-term member of RWA, I strongly believe it is the organization’s role to stand up for quality in the romance industry, and to help its newest members attain the highest level of that quality. Now is not the time to give up that role, or to diminish the importance of its biggest symbol, the Golden Heart®.

Cheers,
Donna






Friday, April 4, 2014

IS IT LOVE? JUDGING GH AND RITA

Remember, feedback can be, um, subjective.


The romance world has its own form of March Madness, which blows in with the annual announcement of the RWA® Golden Heart® and RITA® awards for excellence in romance writing.  This year’s announcement of the finalists (and congratulations to all of you!) brought the usual windstorm of excitement.  But it also whipped up a gale of controversy over new rules for judging the contests for unpublished manuscripts (Golden Heart®) and published works (RITA®). Few members of RWA were happy with the results of the new process.

Starting with this contest year, scores for these contests gave a much heavier weight to the romantic component of the story.  Of a possible 50 points awarded an entry, 20 were given for the romance (how it was presented and developed); 10 for the plot/story; 10 for the characters; and 10 for the writing (mechanics, style, etc.).  In order to reach the final round (ie. to be named a “finalist”), an entry had to earn 90 percent of the possible points (or at least 45).  Let me tell you, that’s a high bar.

The controversy began when these rules were first announced a year ago.  Now that we’ve seen them in action, a few grumbles have become a roar of protest within the organization. In two categories of the RITA (Romantic Suspense and Inspirational), finalists were astonishingly few.  In others (Historical, Contemporary), they were unbelievably numerous. Even if you’re willing to give the rules the benefit of the doubt, the outcomes are enough to make you wonder.  Can there really be that much difference in quality between categories?*

Those who object the loudest see the contest rules as only one symptom of a growing tendency of the organization to narrow its focus unnecessarily, excluding everyone not engaged in a very strict form of romance writing.  Letters and emails are flying toward the RWA Board; the Board is answering, alas, not that they hear the concerns and will take them into consideration, but by digging in its heels.
**sigh** Can’t we all just get along?
The problem is not so much that the new rules for judging are causing problems, though they obviously are.  The problem is one that has carried over from the previous system and affects judging of contests not only at the RWA National level, but also at the local chapter level.  Who trains the judges?
I’ve been to five national conferences now and studied the workshop offerings thoroughly, and I’ve yet to see a workshop offered on How To Judge a Writing Contest, much less How To Judge the Golden Heart® or RITA®.  The first time I volunteered to judge my local chapter contest, I was given a three-page handout as a guide and told to have at it.  I was (and still am—until next year) an unpublished writer with no credentials.  I just happened to be an editor by past experience, but a lot of my fellow judges had nothing of the sort to offer.
To be a judge, even at the national level, even for something as important as GH, all you have to do is be an RWA member and volunteer.  To judge for RITA, you just have to be a member of PAN, and willing to do it.  

 Most newbie judges think they’re qualified to judge because they’re readers.  After all, if it’s good, it’s good, right?  If it’s bad, it’ll be obvious.  But recognizing why something works is not so easy, and analyzing why something is not working is even harder.  The subtleties of scoring can drive you out of your mind—is this plot hole worth a three-point deduction? Or just two?  Did the author ace the character development for a ten, or just miss it for a nine?  AAAGGHH!  (Just thinking about it stresses me out—Fool For Love, Virginia Romance Writers’ contest is coming up!)
And newbies are not the only problem.  The longer a judge has been at it, the more individual prejudices come into play.  This is the infamous “East German judge” problem—the judge who just doesn’t seem to get anything about the entry and scores it really low for no apparent reason.  Or doesn’t like independent females, so will score the entry low in the character section if it includes a spunky gal.  Or, and this seems to be a huge problem this year, has misinterpreted the rules not about what romance consists of, but about what a romance (novel) is.
You see, I don’t think the rule about giving the romance extra weight in the score is necessarily a bad thing.  Romance has its conventions, just as SF does.  Thus, readers expect for the hero and heroine to meet up within the first couple of chapters, to interact frequently, to show some chemistry, to follow a well-defined path through the romantic arc to the black moment, resolution and HEA/HFN.  Contest judges have a right to expect the entries for a romance writing contest to demonstrate these things, too, and to score them based on how well they do them.  If the entry is only part of the manuscript (like Golden Heart® is), then a lot of this has to be hinted at in the first 50 pages.  That’s just the reality of the GH.
The problem comes with judges who are too used to seeing this romantic arc within the context of stories in which the external arc (or plot) deals almost purely with relationships—contemporaries or historicals.  In those kinds of stories, the romance plays out within a very confined external “universe”—friends, family, the town—that revolves around the couple and involves them in almost every scene.  There may be a mystery to solve, or a family crisis or obstacle to overcome, but the external plot has less scope than in other subgenres (paranormal/SFR, romantic suspense, even inspirational).  The best writers in contemporary and historical spend just as much of their “time” on worldbuilding, but it’s such a “familiar” world to their readers, that work often goes unnoticed, particularly by untrained observers.
In paranormal and, of course, SFR, worldbuilding is fundamental to any understanding of the story.  The most heart-wrenching romance must be set within a believable, detailed world populated with creatures and ideas that may be completely new to the reader.  That takes a bit of introduction.  Any judge encountering this for the first time—with no training—might think the worldbuilding is taking precedence over the romance.  Not so (at least, not so if the writer is doing her job right).  If the romantic arc is still intact—from Boy Meets Girl to HEA/HFN—and the romance touches the heart as it should, then that romance should score well, regardless of where the romance is set.
So we go back to training the judges so they are using at least minimally objective criteria rather than just their instincts as readers/writers.  
Believe me, I’m aware there may be resistance to this idea.  I’m involved in a parallel effort right now to upgrade the training for tournament judges and referees in Isshinryu karate.  Imagine telling a sixth-degree black belt that his kata (form) judging could use some improvement!  Still, better that he get on board with some standardized criteria for judging than for everyone to continue to leave the tournaments complaining about the unfairness of the judging.
And better for the RWA national leadership to insist on training for its judges than to allow this controversy to fester in its ranks.

*The good news is that the RITA Paranormal category was neither too small nor too large, with several SFR finalists!
Cheers, Donna





Tuesday, March 26, 2013

MANY CONGRATS 2013 GOLDEN HEART/RITA FINALISTS!


If you're not a romance writer, you probably have no clue what a career-launching event this day can be. But if you are, you probably know exactly what it's all about, and what it means. (You can read more about the awards on the RWA web site.)

If you're one of the giddy new finalists who just happened upon this post, we offer you MANY CONGRATS! on your extreme good fortune and invite you to post your fantabulous news in comments below so we can squee along with you. 

Please feel free to ask any questions about the whole head-spinning Golden Heart process. We've had our shot at tripping down the light-fantastic road and we'd love to share the wealth with anyone who's been struck by the powerful, career-bending force of nature that is the RWA Golden Heart Awards.

Here at Spacefreighters Lounge, we have a Golden Heart record we're very proud of. Pippa Jay, who is already a successful author, has never entered, but as a group we can proudly claim multiple nominations. Let me recap:

2009  
Golden Heart Final by Sharon Lynn Fisher for GHOST PLANET

2010 
Golden Heart Final by Sharon Lynn Fisher for SHADOWED (aka GHOST PLANET)

2011 
Golden Heart Final by Sharon Lynn Fisher for ECHO 8
Golden Heart Final by Laurie A. Green for P2PC
Golden Heart Final by Laurie A. Green for THE OUTER PLANETS
(Sharon Lynn Fisher became ineligible to enter due to the sale of GHOST PLANET)

2012
Golden Heart Final by Donna S. Frelick for UNCHAINED MEMORY
Golden Heart Final by Donna S. Frelick for TROUBLE IN MIND
Golden Heart Final by Laurie A. Green for DRAXIS

So please join us in celebrating all the shiny new tiaras being handed out today, and if you're fortunate enough to be wearing one, be proud! Trust us, for an aspiring romance writer there's no experience on the planet that compares.

~~~~~ * ~~~~~